I know, it read funny, but i was running out of characters and had to edit it-2.5 men is getting better-it’s been good from about midway throughthe first season on-it’s just funny-no hugs, no learning, none of that-just comedy-give it a look, I think you’ll like it-mostAndy Ackerman shows are pretty good, he started as an editor on Cheers,and eventually took over the show, I’m sure thats where the Ted Danson references come from, also on Becker, Andy’s show, the Diner is called Reggie’s
wait are you saying 2.5 men is getting better now, or getting worse? i’ve actually never watched the show. i prefer seinfeld repeats to anything that’s on these days…..
the basic storyline was flawed, the law they were charged with violating said something along the likes of: If it was “reasonably safe” to intervene, you were obligated to-if i remember right, the mugger had a gun, or at least had his hand in his pocket like he had a gun-so, that doesn’t seem reasobly safe to me-greatest show of all times-no lessons, no “special episodes” none of that bs, 2 and a half men is like that now, some of the early episodes were “touchy feely” both by Andy Ackerman
LOL this was probably the only great scene from the finale, jackie was awesome!!!!!
I still think the show is the greatest of all time!!!!!
Elaine seemed so nice in this scene. She actually reached out to her lawyer…. lol
What do you guys think?
Related IRS posts:
- What type of lawyer spends the most amount of time at an office, not a courtroom? On each TV show/movie which concerned Lawyers, we see them in the courtroom arguing the case. Personally, we wish to...
- How do I get my lawyer to get back into the courtroom and follow up on the jury findings? The jury motionless me as a solitary conservator. The father has supervised visitation. The usually thing left is to follow...
- What kind of lawyer/person should I see to check the validity of a contract? My father as good as we have been about to presumably come in in to stipulate with a commercial operation...
- What type of lawyer should I become? How much does it pay? I wish to go to college to investigate law though i’m not certain which sort of law i similar to...
- What kind of lawyer should I seek under the following situation? I give the loan about 00 Aus dollars to the crony of cave as well as we am incompetent to...
If you like this blog please take a second and subscribe to my rss feedIRS Lawyer Topics: AND, Bystanders, Bystanding, Chiles, courtroom scene, finale, Innocent, innocent bystanders, Jackie, jackie chiles, Laughing, Lying, Seinfeld
Comments: 25 comments
All the IRS TAX fields that are marked with REQ must be filled when search for IRS Tax
Zitozu
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
Only you… Can stop them!
farang82
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
should of been one of the main characters!
ReallyGoodFeting
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
It was on some episode from south park
24onepiece
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
@ReallyGoodFeting explain?
ReallyGoodFeting
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
He’s using the Chewbacca technique!!
PianoMagnet3
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
I love the way he says “bystander.”
mauriceh01
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
mortified and stupified lol
klwewf
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
From 0:35-0:55, that should have won them the case. Jackie is right on point! The gangs other antics over the years is what buried them!
ozirion73
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
I am schocked and chagrined!
chibearsfan313
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
umm no
kostishflr95
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
good samaritan law? never heard of it !
mrREDBIRDFAN
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
This guy got OJ off the hook
ruinovy
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
the best closing argument ever
cecboydkj
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
was the real perpetrator Jackie Chiles talk about at 0:19 was the Robber who robs the Fay Guy that the Four made fun
of?!?
GWBsux
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
One of the greatest characters, ever!!
OlderG0ds
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
Yea this scene is great. All Jackie Chiles scenes really, he’s probably my favorite secondary character. Totally a spoof of Johnny Cochran.
ApeWithBone
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
That was amazing!! That made my day.
billpeterson5150
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
I know, it read funny, but i was running out of characters and had to edit it-2.5 men is getting better-it’s been good from about midway throughthe first season on-it’s just funny-no hugs, no learning, none of that-just comedy-give it a look, I think you’ll like it-mostAndy Ackerman shows are pretty good, he started as an editor on Cheers,and eventually took over the show, I’m sure thats where the Ted Danson references come from, also on Becker, Andy’s show, the Diner is called Reggie’s
poops1
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
wait are you saying 2.5 men is getting better now, or getting worse? i’ve actually never watched the show. i prefer seinfeld repeats to anything that’s on these days…..
billpeterson5150
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
the basic storyline was flawed, the law they were charged with violating said something along the likes of: If it was “reasonably safe” to intervene, you were obligated to-if i remember right, the mugger had a gun, or at least had his hand in his pocket like he had a gun-so, that doesn’t seem reasobly safe to me-greatest show of all times-no lessons, no “special episodes” none of that bs, 2 and a half men is like that now, some of the early episodes were “touchy feely” both by Andy Ackerman
poops1
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
LOL this was probably the only great scene from the finale, jackie was awesome!!!!!
I still think the show is the greatest of all time!!!!!
Elaine seemed so nice in this scene. She actually reached out to her lawyer…. lol
What do you guys think?
850iStyle
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
classic
Thewarriors79
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
No.George Steinbrenner was.
threenailzz
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
I want Jackie on my side if I ever go to court!!!(LOL)
pegleg747
February 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
…”a bystander by definition, is innocent; that is the nature of bystanding!”
It’s actually a good argument, as someone commented.
Leave a reply