Why the Rich Love McCain’s Tax Plan Under George Bush, 31% of a taxation cuts were since to a wealthiest 1% of Americans. Under McCain’s plan, 58%...
John McCain On Taxing Rich People From the Hardball College Tour, Oct 12, 2000: UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Hi. Since I’ve been study politics, I’ve had this subject...
Snooki Pissed Over Obama Tanning Tax www.theyoungturks.com New TYT Facebook Page(!): www.facebook.com Subscribe to a FREE Video Podcast upon iTunes: bit.ly Follow us upon Twitter: twitter.com...
When I watched this video you notice that CNN does not discuss why McCain is not taxing the super rich. They are his main sponsors, while Obama got most of his campaign contribution in smaller donations from the middle class.
Macroeconomics 101, yes government needs to spend more and even if it makes up for it with higher taxes, it will benefit the country as a whole (simple keynesian theory)
Voting systems are rigged.President are chosen, not elected by the people. Democracy is a sham, and almost all opinions in politics are formed by the Illuminati, and anything that is not serving the political agenda of the puppet masters, it is not considered politically correct.
When did we give consent? Are you saying that people don’t have to pay taxes? If that’s true I don’t know why so many people do it. I bet the framers really regretted that “general welfare” statement.
The government shouldn’t spend money in times of recession. That will only make the recessions worse. They need to cut spending and let people keep and spend more of their own money.
It’s not involuntary because we give consent for the gov’t to take some of our money to promote the general welfare, as is its job in the Const. Bureaucrats don’t “stash” the money away or put it in their own pockets. corruption is rare in the US. Plus, the gov’t needs money to spend in times of recession to avoid depressions. Yes, I’m a Keynesian.
I’m not against private enterprise, but there is a key difference between business and gov’t. private business’ #1 goal is profit. Period. gov’t's #1 goal (at least in this country) is public good. Sure, sometimes there is a mixing and the gov’t doesn’t always do a good job, but without gov’t i highly doubt that private companies would have much incentive to prevent pollution, collusion, or unfair wages. deregulation is sometimes a good thing, but definitely not for everything.
What makes you think private companies don’t want to promote the public good? Are the people in the government inherently better than people who work in private businesses? I don’t think so. Businesses have to promote the public good if they want to make any money. The government is guaranteed the money that it takes from us by force no matter how poorly it does. I would trust a private company over the government any day.
In theory, that is not necessarily a bad idea, in its own way, its in fact a good idea, but there are pros & cons to every choice, you have to remember that private companies only do jobs for themselves, they are there to make money, not to promote the public good, or because they care about people. As for now, I’m not exactly sure how the rest of the country goes about maintaining roads, but it does make sense to tax gasoline and use that among other things to fund public road maintenence.
…In addition, I am not in favor of ANY bailouts. If a business fails do to its own greed & neglect to detail…so be it. The ONLY reason the government donates OUR tax dollars to these failing entities, is self interest…After all, Who do you think funded, and elected this administration? I would start with ACORN, and the Unions.
I am assuming you are responding to a comment I made in regard to government run institutions? If you take a better look at these entities, you will find some discouraging statistics ie USPS going bankrupt, Schools, Fire, EMS, and Law enforcement, ALL suffering layoffs due to mismanaged funding, and inflated books…And soon to be Gov. run health care…Well…You can ask Canada, and the UK just how well thats working out. Why do you think Physicians are moving to private practices in droves?
The income tax only accounts for 40% of the government’s budget. If we got rid of the federal income tax the government would get the same amount of money as it got in 1997. It’s wrong for the government to take money right out of our paychecks anyway. If part of our pay goes directly to the government, how is that any different from involuntary servitude?
last time i checked the fire and police department and in pretty good shape in my town. fires still being put out, police still arresting people and writing tickets.. i hear about a lot more problems in private industry – lay-offs, stagnant and cut wages, ridiculously large bonuses and pensions, money waste, product inefficiency, safety and health code violations, companies asking the government for more and more money…
income tax pays for a lot of disabled and elderly people to get by, and a lot of them are still in poverty because there actually ISNT enough money to go around.
i think it is perfectly fair, if you think about it, the majority of the people making 2.9mil are those scamming CEO’s not many others right this second.
That’s a deceptive tax figure. It is the average including the taxes of people who make billions, LOL They are NOT taking an extra 700,000 from someone making 2.9 million. I believe the increase was actually 3% which would work out to an increase of $84,000
Eh, the Illuminati is run by reptilian kin known throughout history as Jinn, Naga, Angels/Demons, Dragons, Dracul, Al Gore, Windsors, Rothschilds etc. that rule the inner circles of Freemasonry and do foul sex&torture rituals. They’ll probably release a bird flu virus via vaccines(or by drones), go to internet 2, start WW3 w/China, have a staged alien invasion(2010) to get a microchipped pop/world gov but they will fail! Support FreemanTV, Alex Jones, Dr.Deagle, David Icke & Project Camelot!
There may be some things that the government needs taxes to pay for but it doesn’t need to take in nearly as much of our money as it does now. We don’t need to have an income tax either.
Related IRS posts:
- Barack Obama on McCain’s Tax Plan Barack Obama speaks about John McCain’s taxation devise in St. Louis, Missouri....
- “I Screwed Up !” : Barack Obama | Cabinet Tax Cheats Exposed | Change and Hope ? Barack Obama takes shortcoming for nominating taxation cheaters for cupboard posts. [FEB 2009]...
- Why the Rich Love McCain’s Tax Plan Under George Bush, 31% of a taxation cuts were since to a wealthiest 1% of Americans. Under McCain’s plan, 58%...
- John McCain On Taxing Rich People From the Hardball College Tour, Oct 12, 2000: UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Hi. Since I’ve been study politics, I’ve had this subject...
- Snooki Pissed Over Obama Tanning Tax www.theyoungturks.com New TYT Facebook Page(!): www.facebook.com Subscribe to a FREE Video Podcast upon iTunes: bit.ly Follow us upon Twitter: twitter.com...
If you like this blog please take a second and subscribe to my rss feedIRS Lawyer Topics: american, barack, cnn, election08, Income, john, mccain, morning, NextNewNetworks, obama, plan, policy, Tax, Taxes
Comments: 25 comments
All the IRS TAX fields that are marked with REQ must be filled when search for IRS Tax
MrMustachMan
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
When I watched this video you notice that CNN does not discuss why McCain is not taxing the super rich. They are his main sponsors, while Obama got most of his campaign contribution in smaller donations from the middle class.
ab1tchslap
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
Your simple Keynesian theory is wrong. The government should cut taxes and lower spending so the people have more money to spend.
floreshasan
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
Macroeconomics 101, yes government needs to spend more and even if it makes up for it with higher taxes, it will benefit the country as a whole (simple keynesian theory)
NWOSupporter2012
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
Voting systems are rigged.President are chosen, not elected by the people. Democracy is a sham, and almost all opinions in politics are formed by the Illuminati, and anything that is not serving the political agenda of the puppet masters, it is not considered politically correct.
Donlarceny213
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
well we must be a stupid country cuz it was a land slide..
danoftherepublic
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
pocket change
NWOSupporter2012
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
Smart people did not vote for O’Puppet or McSame.
libradaritadjv
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
Nice work. keep it up. mean time come for social media marketing for esteembpo**com FHJ
ab1tchslap
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
When did we give consent? Are you saying that people don’t have to pay taxes? If that’s true I don’t know why so many people do it. I bet the framers really regretted that “general welfare” statement.
The government shouldn’t spend money in times of recession. That will only make the recessions worse. They need to cut spending and let people keep and spend more of their own money.
GenerationPoof
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
It’s not involuntary because we give consent for the gov’t to take some of our money to promote the general welfare, as is its job in the Const. Bureaucrats don’t “stash” the money away or put it in their own pockets. corruption is rare in the US. Plus, the gov’t needs money to spend in times of recession to avoid depressions. Yes, I’m a Keynesian.
GenerationPoof
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
I’m not against private enterprise, but there is a key difference between business and gov’t. private business’ #1 goal is profit. Period. gov’t's #1 goal (at least in this country) is public good. Sure, sometimes there is a mixing and the gov’t doesn’t always do a good job, but without gov’t i highly doubt that private companies would have much incentive to prevent pollution, collusion, or unfair wages. deregulation is sometimes a good thing, but definitely not for everything.
RadicalLibertarian
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
Why didn’t they talk about anything between 120 and 2.9 million? Is it because McCain won in every category in between?
Anyway, Obama’s income tax average savings is $20. How’s that for change we need!?
ab1tchslap
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
What makes you think private companies don’t want to promote the public good? Are the people in the government inherently better than people who work in private businesses? I don’t think so. Businesses have to promote the public good if they want to make any money. The government is guaranteed the money that it takes from us by force no matter how poorly it does. I would trust a private company over the government any day.
Rjay4prez
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
In theory, that is not necessarily a bad idea, in its own way, its in fact a good idea, but there are pros & cons to every choice, you have to remember that private companies only do jobs for themselves, they are there to make money, not to promote the public good, or because they care about people. As for now, I’m not exactly sure how the rest of the country goes about maintaining roads, but it does make sense to tax gasoline and use that among other things to fund public road maintenence.
Hamcarver
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
…In addition, I am not in favor of ANY bailouts. If a business fails do to its own greed & neglect to detail…so be it. The ONLY reason the government donates OUR tax dollars to these failing entities, is self interest…After all, Who do you think funded, and elected this administration? I would start with ACORN, and the Unions.
Hamcarver
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
I am assuming you are responding to a comment I made in regard to government run institutions? If you take a better look at these entities, you will find some discouraging statistics ie USPS going bankrupt, Schools, Fire, EMS, and Law enforcement, ALL suffering layoffs due to mismanaged funding, and inflated books…And soon to be Gov. run health care…Well…You can ask Canada, and the UK just how well thats working out. Why do you think Physicians are moving to private practices in droves?
ab1tchslap
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
The income tax only accounts for 40% of the government’s budget. If we got rid of the federal income tax the government would get the same amount of money as it got in 1997. It’s wrong for the government to take money right out of our paychecks anyway. If part of our pay goes directly to the government, how is that any different from involuntary servitude?
yonskii
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
last time i checked the fire and police department and in pretty good shape in my town. fires still being put out, police still arresting people and writing tickets.. i hear about a lot more problems in private industry – lay-offs, stagnant and cut wages, ridiculously large bonuses and pensions, money waste, product inefficiency, safety and health code violations, companies asking the government for more and more money…
yonskii
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
are you kidding me? $100,000 is “terrible” income?! where in the heck do you live? for most people thats enough to get buy and have extra. get real.
yonskii
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
income tax pays for a lot of disabled and elderly people to get by, and a lot of them are still in poverty because there actually ISNT enough money to go around.
MaStErKuSHx420x
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
i think it is perfectly fair, if you think about it, the majority of the people making 2.9mil are those scamming CEO’s not many others right this second.
Pardon entertainers, not fair to them.
johnedwards1968
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
That’s a deceptive tax figure. It is the average including the taxes of people who make billions, LOL They are NOT taking an extra 700,000 from someone making 2.9 million. I believe the increase was actually 3% which would work out to an increase of $84,000
EndOfTimesProphecy
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
Spread this with energy and everywhere, in all manners.
End of Times, Apocalypse.
Obama carries the MARKS OF THE BEAST.
This video will change your life and also the world soon.
See it at my page’s video.
deagla
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
Eh, the Illuminati is run by reptilian kin known throughout history as Jinn, Naga, Angels/Demons, Dragons, Dracul, Al Gore, Windsors, Rothschilds etc. that rule the inner circles of Freemasonry and do foul sex&torture rituals. They’ll probably release a bird flu virus via vaccines(or by drones), go to internet 2, start WW3 w/China, have a staged alien invasion(2010) to get a microchipped pop/world gov but they will fail! Support FreemanTV, Alex Jones, Dr.Deagle, David Icke & Project Camelot!
ab1tchslap
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
We could privatize the street making business.
There may be some things that the government needs taxes to pay for but it doesn’t need to take in nearly as much of our money as it does now. We don’t need to have an income tax either.
Leave a reply